An Obvious Choice
For most people, the decision to use a machine that costs nothing to use, as compared to becoming dependent and or addicted to prescription drugs is truly an obvious choice. Often this is of great importance to those who are allergic, or prone to bad reactions to conventional drug therapies. The most common approach is to slowly reduce the drug to nothing as the effect of the therapy takes over.
In some cases however, it is problematic as the use of the machine may stir up the blood and the immune system to such a degree that it can become difficult or impossible to get accurate indications from conventional testing. When testing is essential, precautionary measures may be taken to help reduce the confusion this can cause.
Many drug therapies actually work better with fewer side effects when used with frequency therapy.
Not all drug therapies should be eliminated.
The most obvious, and the most common drugs to be eliminated by the machine are antibiotics. In most cases the machine is far superior in every way. This fact does not mean that antibiotics are of no use, and in some cases it may even be the best choice when used in conjunction with frequency therapy.
When the symptoms of a disease are prominent, profound, anomalous or morbid, it is easy for the user to tell if it is working, and as they make progress, drugs are reduced or eliminated as the problem goes away. But when the symptoms are ambiguous, or undetectable by the user, the elimination of a drug therapy should be well considered, carefully studied and/or supervised if possible.
In the final analysis, it is of considerable value to have a device that can eliminate the need to use most drugs. The broader view suggests that drug prices would be reduced in an open market, doctor and hospital loads would be reduced, insurance would become cheaper and better, children and infants would become much more resistant to infection, and the spread of all contagion would be cut by a percentage.
